---
title: Open Science
aliases:
- Open Research
- Open Science
visibility: public
related:
- "[[resa|ReSA]]"
- "[[Research]]"
---
| Resources | References |
| ---- | ---- |
| See also | [[Research]] |
| [Research Software Alliance](ReSA) | [ReSA Guidelines] |
| [Research Data Alliance](RDA) | |
# Open Science
## Organisations
- [[eScienceCenter]]
- [[ARDC]]
- [[OSCG]]
- [Public Spaces](https://publicspaces.net)
- [PubHubs](https://pubhubs.net/index.html)
- [Video presentation @PublicSpaces](https://video.publicspaces.net/w/wzZ1H4iUNBkchwVKNyXBU6)
- [[Turing Institute]]
- [OW2](https://www.ow2.org): Open source community for professional software
involved in some EU projects
- [IT infrastructure](https://www.ow2.org/view/IT_Infrastructure/)
- [Software projects](https://projects.ow2.org/view/wiki/)
- [Open Science (projects)](https://www.ow2.org/view/openscience/)
- OECD
- [Council Recommendation on Access to Research Data from Public Funding.](https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0347)
- UNESCO
- [Recommendation on Open Science](https://en.unesco.org/science-sustainable-future/open-science/recommendation)
## Countries
See also [ReSA Guidelines]: National and regional policies and strategies
- France
- https://www.ouvrirlascience.fr/get-started-with-open-science/
### Netherlands
- [Article @Science Guide: “De universiteiten in Nederland zijn op de rug gaan liggen voor Big Tech”](https://www.scienceguide.nl/2023/05/de-universiteiten-in-nederland-zijn-op-de-rug-gaan-liggen-voor-big-tech/)
20 July 2022: [Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment](file://journal/personal/science/2022_07_19_rra_agreement_final.pdf), I. Base [...] principles
> Ensure independence and transparency of the data, infrastructure and criteria necessary for
research assessment and for determining research impacts; in particular by clear and
transparent data collection, algorithms and indicators, by ensuring control and ownership by
the research community over critical infrastructures and tools, and by allowing those assessed
to have access to the data, analyses and criteria used.
How is this fulfilled/guaranteed in the case of Dutch universities, relying on external Software to track and evaluate scientific output.
[^1]: <https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2018/jun/29/elsevier-are-corrupting-open-science-in-europe>
[^2]: <https://www.liquisearch.com/elsevier/criticism_and_controversies>
[^3]: <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/feb/02/academics-boycott-publisher-elsevier>
## Universities
### RUG
- [[personal/research/organisations/rug#Open Science|RUG: Open Science]]
- [Website Open Science](https://www.rug.nl/research/openscience/)
- [Program](https://www.rug.nl/research/openscience/ug-open-science-program/)
- [Ambassadors](https://www.rug.nl/research/openscience/open-science-ambassadeurs)
> [!info]- [[08-09-2022: Webinar Pure]]
> RUG gibt an sich für FAIR Prinzipien und Open Access einzusetzen. Andererseits baut man auf Software von Elsevier, die nicht unbedingt dafür bekannt sind, Offenheit und Zugänglichkeit in der Wissenschaft zu fördern.[^1][^2][^3] Viele Länder und Hochschulen boykottieren Elsevier. Niederländische Hochschulen haben dagegen mit dem Verlag verhandelt und sich Zugang zu Artikeln erkauft. Der Preis - man hat sich bereit erklärt für Elsevier Meta-Daten zu generieren. Dazu wird die Software Pure verwendet. An der Universität Groningen wird teilweise die Vergabe von Mitteln an den Aktivitäten (auf Pure) festgemacht. Ist dieses Vorgehen transparent? Was ist die zugrundeliegende Metrik?
2023-08-31: [Blog post on high salaries of publishing CEOs](https://www.rug.nl/about-ug/policy-and-strategy/data-autonomy/blog/overpaid-bankers-think-again-scientific-publishers-top-the-charts)
## People
- <a href="https://www.rug.nl/staff/s.van.lanen/">S. (Sander) van Lanen | How to find us | Find a member of staff | University of Groningen</a>
- Melanie Imming: [OrcID](https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2376-9755) | [website](https://www.immingimpact.eu/)
consultant, material on Open Science (presentations, brochures, ...)
## Principles
### FAIR
- [Article FAIR software principles](https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fsdata.2016.18)
- [FAIR Principles for Research Software ](https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00068)
- [Nature article Introducing the FAIR Principles for research software](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-022-01710-x#ref-CR1)
- [[ARDC]] [FAIR principles self-assesment tool for research software](https://fairsoftwarechecklist.net)
## References
- [The Turing Way](https://the-turing-way.netlify.app/index.html) | [](https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/the-turing-way) | [](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3233986)
- [RUG Open Science Blog: Good practices for FAIR data management - an interview with Robert Inklaar (Director GGDC) on achieving impact with open data](https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/blog/good-practices-for-fair-data-management-an-interview-with-robert-inklaar-achieving-impact-with-ope) #science/openscience #data/management #science/data
- collaboration: [[EU_Horizon]] projects
- [DataverseNL](https://www.rug.nl/digital-competence-centre/research-data/archive-and-publish/dataversenl)
- [GGDC website](http://www.ggdc.net/)
- declarations
- [Berlin declaration on Open Access](https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration)
- [Budapest Open Access declaration](https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/)
- [Policy Clause Bank and Policy Generator](https://www.orfg.org/news/2022/6/8/orfg-releases-new-resource-to-facilitate-funders-open-research-policies)
[ReSA Guidelines]: <https://www.researchsoft.org/guidelines/>